Last week, the Department of Defense announced that 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammad and two co-defendants had reached plea deals. Generally, the defendants would plead guilty to various charges before the military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay and accept life in prison, and in exchange would be spared the death penalty. Then the Department of Defense announced that the deals are off. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a memo revoking the deals and reserving to himself the authority to enter into plea agreements. Some families of 9/11 victims have cheered Austin’s decision while others support the deals. The defendants assert that a deal’s a deal and that Austin can’t nix them. Litigation is sure to ensue, further extending cases that have lasted more than two decades already. Keep reading for more news.
eCourts expansion continues. Fans of Star Trek: The Next Generation may recall the Borg, an alien civilization that consumes its adversaries and incorporates them into its hive mind. When encountering new cultures, the Borg typically informs them that “resistance is futile” and that “you will be assimilated.” I’m not suggesting that anyone would want to resist eCourts expansion – though some may be uneasy about it given early challenges with the rollout – but resistance definitely appears to be futile. The remaining counties (plus the Business Court) will be assimilated into eCourts in 2025 according to this press release from the Administrative Office of the Courts.
DA finds deadly force justified in Charlotte shooting. ABC News reports here that Mecklenburg County District Attorney Spencer Merriweather has determined that the officers who shot and killed Terry Clark Hughes Jr. this spring were justified in doing so. Recall that Hughes had killed four officers attempting to serve him with arrest warrants before he was himself killed.
Justice Gorsuch speaks on overcriminalization. Writing with his former law clerk Janie Nitze, Justice Neil Gorsuch has a new book out. It’s called Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law, and you can order it from Amazon here. You can get a sense of the book from this article by Gorsuch and Nitze on the Reason Magazine website. The article begins by asserting: “Not only have we adopted more criminal laws at an astonishing clip, but the punishments our criminal laws carry have also grown markedly.” It goes on to ask whether this development is helpful or harmful. I haven’t read the book yet but have enjoyed some of Justice Gorsuch’s other writings.
En banc Fourth Circuit upholds Maryland’s assault weapons ban. Phil is going to summarize the case in more detail soon, but I thought I’d flag the opinion now for those who are interested. In Bianchi v. Brown, a breezy 183-page read, the Fourth Circuit upheld Maryland’s assault weapons ban. It concluded that the covered weapons are “not within the scope of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms for self-defense” because they are “excessively dangerous,” most suited for criminal activity or military purposes. The court wrote specifically about AR-15 platform rifles, stating that “the AR-15 thrives in combat, mass murder, and overpowering police,” but that “appellants have failed to demonstrate that the weapon is suitable for self-defense.” If you’re thinking that the Fourth Circuit already upheld the Maryland law, you’re right – it did so in Kolbe v. Hogan, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc), but that was before Bruen, applying the now-prohibited means-end test. This week, the court reached the same result applying the mode of analysis mandated by Bruen. There are some procedural wrinkles that make this a less-than-ideal case for Supreme Court review, but the basic issue of states’ ability to ban AR-15s seems like one that the high court will need to tackle eventually.
Speaking of guns and criminal activity. The AP reports here that “[f]amilies of three students murdered during the 2018 massacre at Parkland’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and a wounded former student have reached multimillion-dollar settlements in a lawsuit against the shooter.” Specifically, the parents of two deceased students reached $50 million settlements with gunman Nikolas Cruz while a wounded student agreed to a $40 million settlement. Cruz is indigent and serving 34 consecutive life sentences, so the likelihood of a recovery is small. According to the plaintiffs’ attorney, “[t]he chief rationale for the judgment amounts is simply in the event that the killer ever comes into possession of money, we could execute on the judgments and obtain it, thus preventing him from buying any creature comforts.”
Getting drivers to put down their phones. Ars Technica has this story about a new study by Progressive Insurance. It enrolled 1,653 drivers in the study. On average, they used their phones over 6 minutes per hour of driving time. In an effort to get them to use their phones less, Progressive tried several interventions. Giving drivers “education about the problem” didn’t have any effect. But “competitive gamification,” where drivers competed to reduce phone use, was helpful, and giving drivers cash prizes for reducing their phone use was even more promising.
They take chess very seriously in Russia. Another interesting article on Ars Technica reports that “Russia is no stranger to unique poisonings. . . . But a new ‘first’ in the long history of poisonings was opened this month in the Russian republic of Dagestan, where a 40-something chess player named Amina Abakarova attempted to poison a rival by depositing liquid mercury on and around her chess board.” The victim felt ill and reported seeing silver or gray beads rolling around her side of the chess board. The suspect has been suspended from chess competitions and presumably is facing a criminal investigation.
Stay safe out there, especially if you’re considering any chess this weekend.
#News #Roundup #North #Carolina #Criminal #Law
